Comparison of Penetration Capability of Several Contemporary 5.56×45 mm Projectiles into Hard Targets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01870Keywords:
small-caliber ammunition, 5.56 × 45 mm, penetration, terminal ballistics, simulationAbstract
The analysis was performed on six commonly used 5.56 × 45 mm projectile types (M193, M855, M855A1, L31A1, M995, and AP45). The projectile’s impact velocity (chosen as 900 m/s) was the same in the examination process. This made it possible to assess how the projectile’s design has affected its performance against a hard steel target. These evaluations included numerical simulations (Ansys Autodyn) of projectile impacts. Using the available experimental data, the materials in the computational model were first validated. A short description and CAD model of projectiles is also given. Relevant conclusions were reported.
References
LEEDER, J. Armor Piercing Bullets with Sintered Carbide Cores [online]. 1941 [viewed 2024-02-02]. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0702256.pdf
HAZELL, P.J., M.J. IREMONGER, P.C. BARTON and J.P.F. BROOS. Anomalous Target Failure at Small Angles of Obliquity. In: 21st International Symposium on Ballistics. Adelaide: Adelaide Convention Centre, 2004, pp. 928-934. ISBN 978-0-9752028-0-7.
FLORES-JOHNSON, E., M. SALEH and L. EDWARDS. Ballistic Performance of Multi-Layered Metallic Plates Impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 Projectile. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(12), pp. 1022-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.005.
KILIÇ, N. and B. EKICI. Ballistic Resistance of High Hardness Armor Steels Against 7.62 mm Armor Piercing Ammunition. Materials and Design, 2013, 44, pp. 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.045.
KILIÇ, N., B. EKICI and S. HARTOMACIOĞLU. Determination of Penetration Depth at High Velocity Impact Using Finite Element Method and Artificial Neural Network Tools. Defence Technology, 2015, 11(2), pp. 110-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2014.12.001.
WIŚNIEWSKI, A. and D. PACEK. Flexible Modular Armour for Protection Against the 5.56 × 45 mm SS109 Projectiles. Problems of Mechatronics Armament, Aviation, Safety Engineering, 2015, 2(20), pp. 21-40. https://doi.org/10.5604/20815891.1157772.
HAZELL, P.J. Numerical Simulations and Experimental Observations of the 5.56-mm L2A2 Bullet Perforating Steel Targets of Two Hardness Values. Journal of Battlefield Technology, 2003, 6(1), pp 1-4. ISSN 1440-5113.
JANISZEWSKI, J., M. GRĄZKA, D.E. TRIA, Z. SURMA and B. FIKUS. Laboratory Investigations on Perforation of 30PM Steel Plates. Problems of Mechatronics Armament, Aviation, Safety Engineering, 2016, 7(2), pp. 19-40. https://doi.org/10.5604/20815891.1203115.
COGHE, F., N. NSIAMPA, L. RABET and G. DYCKMANS. Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Origins of the Bodywork Effect (K-Effect). Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2010, 77(5). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001692.
KOLMAKOV, A.G., I.O. BANNYKH, V.I. ANTIPOV, L.V. VINOGRADOV, and M.A. SEVOST’YANOV. Materials for Bullet Cores. Russian Metallurgy (Metally), 2020, 2021(4), pp. 351-362. https://doi.org/10.31044/1814-4632-2020-10-8-21.
Di BENEDETTO, G., P. MATTEIS and G. SCAVINO. Impact Behavior and Ballistic Efficiency of Armor-Piercing Projectiles with Tool Steel Cores. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 115, pp. 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.12.021.
ANDERSON, Jr., C.E., V. HOHLER, J.D. WALKER and A.J. STILP. The Influence of Projectile Hardness on Ballistic Performance. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22(6), pp. 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00069-4.
TRIA, D.E. and R. TRĘBIŃSKI. Methodology for Experimental Verification of Steel Armour Impact Modelling. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 100, pp. 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.10.011.
ROSENBERG, Z., P. KOSITSKI and E. DEKEL. On the Perforation of Aluminum Plates by 7.62 mm APM2 Projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 97, pp. 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.003.
HAZELL, P.J., G.J. APPLEBY-THOMAS, D. PHILBEY and W. TOLMAN. The Effect of Gilding Jacket Material on the Penetration Mechanics of a 7.62 mm Armour-Piercing Projectile. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 54, pp. 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.10.013.
BØRVIK, T., S. DEY and A.H. CLAUSEN. Perforation Resistance of Five Different High-Strength Steel Plates Subjected to Small-Arms Projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 36, pp. 948-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.003.
DEY, S., T. BØRVIK, X. TENG, T. WIERZBICKI and O.S. HOPPERSTAD. On the Ballistic Resistance of Double-Layered Steel Plates: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44, pp. 6701-6723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.005.
MOHOTTI, D., T. NGO, S.N. RAMAN and P. MENDIS. Analytical and Numerical Investigation of Polyurea Layered Aluminium Plates Subjected to High Velocity Projectile Impact. Materials and Design, 2015, 82, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.036.
HUB, J. and P. KNEYS. 3D Simulation Analysis of Aircraft Protection Material Impacting by 7.62 mm Ammunition, University Review, 2013, 7(3), pp. 15-19. ISSN 1337-6047.
SOYDAN, A.M., B. TUNABOYLU, A.G. ELSABAGH, A.K. SARI and R. AKDENIZ. Simulation and Experimental Tests of Ballistic Impact on Composite Laminate Armor. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 18, 4696143. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4696143.
SIRIPHALA, P., T. VEERAKLAEW, W. KULSIRIKASEM and G. TANAPORNRAWEEKIT. Validation of FE Models of Bullet Impact on High Strength Steel Armors. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 2012, 126, pp. 75-83. https://doi.org/10.2495/SU120071.
TRIA, D.E. and R. TRĘBIŃSKI. On the Influence of Fracture Criterion on Perforation of High-Strength Steel Plates Subjected to Armour Piercing Projectile. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 62(2), pp. 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1515/meceng-2015-0010.
HORSFALL, I., N. EHSAN and W. BISHOP. A Comparison of the Performance of Various Light Armour Piercing Ammunition. Journal of Battlefield Technology, 2000, 3(3), 3-3-2.
KNEUBUEHL B.P, COUPLAND, R.M., M.A. ROTHSCHILD, M.J. THALI. Wound Ballistics: Basics and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2011. ISBN 978-3-642-43589-8.
HUB, J., J. KOMENDA and F. RACEK. The Analysis of Terminal-Ballistic Behaviour of a Pistol Bullet Penetrating a Block of Substitute Biological Material. Problemy Mechatroniki: Uzbrojenie, Lotnictwo, Inżynieria Bezpieczeństwa, 2013, 4(1), pp. 19-35. ISSN 2081-5891.
BØRVIK, T., A.S. HOPPERSTAD, M. LANSETH and K.A. MALO. Effect of Target Thickness in Blunt Projectile Penetration of Weldox 460 E Steel Plates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2003, 28(4), pp. 413-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00072-6.
YIN, G.X., Q. ZHANG, P. CHEN, B.H. HONG, N. JIANG and D.C. GAO. Study of Armor-Piercing Self-Sharpening Properties of 88WC-12Co Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2478, 072006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2478/7/072006.
EDWARDS, M.R. and A. MATHEWSON. The Ballistic Properties of Tool Steel as a Potential Improvised Armour Plate. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 19(4), pp. 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(97)83210-1.
ERZAR, B. and J.L. ZINSZNER. Dynamic Characterization of Tungsten Carbide Behaviour at Very High Strain-Rates. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2018, 183, 02061. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302061.
MUBASHAR, A., E. UDDIN, S. ANWAR, N. ARIF, U.S. WAHEED and M. CHOWDHURY. Ballistic Response of 12.7 mm Armour Piercing Projectile Against Perforated Armour Developed from Structural Steel. Proc IMechE Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications, 2019, 233(10), pp. 1993-2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718808317.
MUBASHAR, A., E. UDDIN, S. ANWAR, N. ARIF, U.S. WAHEED and M. CHOWDHURY. Ballistic Response of 12.7 mm Armour Piercing Projectile Against Perforated Armour Developed from Structural Steel. Proc IMechE Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications, 2019, 233(10), pp. 1993-2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718808317.
JOHNSON, Jr., A. E. Mechanical Properties at Room Temperature of Four Cermets of Tungsten Carbide with Cobalt Binder [online]. 1954 [viewed 2023-26-12]. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4362482
BØRVIK, T., L. OLOVSSON, S. DEY and M. LANGSETH. Normal and Oblique Impact of Small Arms Bullets on AA6082-T4 Aluminium Protective Plates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(7), pp. 577-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.001.
KILIÇ, N., S. BEDIR, A. ERDIK, B. EKICI, A. TAŞDEMIRCI and M. GÜDEN. Ballistic Behavior of High Hardness Perforated Armor Plates Against 7.62 mm Armor Piercing Projectile. Materials & Design, 2014, 63, pp. 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.030.
HUB, J., J. KOMENDA and M. NOVÁK. Ballistic Limit Evaluation for Impact of Pistol Projectile 9 Mm Luger on Aircraft Skin Metal Plate. Advances in Military Technology 2012, 7(1), pp. 21-29. ISSN 1802-2308.
56 mm (5.56 x 45 mm) Ammunition [online]. [viewed 2023-11-22]. Available from: https://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/rifle/556mm_ammo.html
A Survey of Military 5.56 [online]. 2017 [viewed 2023-11-19]. Available from: https://advanceandreview.wordpress.com/2017/05/04/a-survey-of-military-5-56/
M193 ammunition: Everything You Wanted to Know [online]. 2003 [viewed 2023-12-19]. Available from: https://battlebornreview.com/m193-ammunition/ [viewed 2023-25-11]
56 x 45 mm NATO [online]. [viewed 2023-09-25]. Available from: https://weaponsystems.net/system/1513-5.56x45mm%20NATO
NATO Standard AOP-4172. Technical Performance Specification Providing for the Interchangeability of 5.56 x 45 mm Ammunition [online]. 2020 [viewed 2024-01-25]. Available from: https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14348976/STANAG%204172
Army Ammunition Data Sheets - Small Caliber Ammunition FSC 1305 [online]. 1994 [viewed 2024-02-02]. Available from: https://www.armimilitari.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/tm43-0001-27-small-cartridge.pdf
STEWART, M.G., B. DORROUGH and M.D. NETHERTON. Field Testing and Probabilistic Assessment of Ballistic Penetration of Steel Plates for Small Calibre Military Ammunition. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2018, 10(4), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419618802593.
SILTON, S.I. and B.E. HOWELL. Aerodynamic and Flight Dynamic Characteristics of 5.56-mm Ammunition: M855 [online]. 2010 [viewed 2023-11-25]. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA530895.pdf
Small Arms Ammunition [online]. [viewed 2023-11-19]. Available from: https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/small-arms-ammunition
56 mm x 45 Armor Piercing 3 (M995) [online]. [viewed 2024-02-10]. Available from: nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/5-56mm-series/5-56-mm-x-45-armor-piercing-3/
Tungsten Carbide Armor Piercing Technology [online]. 2015 [viewed 2024-02-20]. Available from: https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2015/smallarms/17379_Erninge.pdf
PIASTA, K. and P. KUPIDURA, Perspective Armour-Piercing Intermediate Cartridge Projectile. Problems of Mechatronics Armament, Aviation, Safety Engineering, 2023, 14(1), pp. 89-104. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2961.
56 mm x 45 Armor Piercing 45 [online]. [viewed 2023-11-25]. Available from: https://www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/5-56mm-series/5-56-mm-x-45-armor-piercing-45/
AUTODYN® - Explicit Software for Nonlinear Dynamics, Theory Manual - Revision 4.3 [online]. 2005 [viewed 2024-02-03]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alireza_Rashiddel/post/Is_there_a_way_to_implement_a_large_strain_viscoelastic_material_model_in_AUTODYN/attachment/5f85890de66b860001a8503cAS%3A946132159045637%401602586893515/download/0-theory_manual_AUTODYN.pdf
CATOVIC, A. Research of Influence of Different Shaped Charge Liner Materials on Penetration Depth Using Numerical Simulations. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2023, 11(4), pp. 1-26. ISSN 2303-4521.
POPŁAWSKI, A., P. KĘDZIERSKI and A. MORKA. Identification of Armox 500T Steel Failure Properties in the Modeling of Perforation Problems. Materials & Design, 2020, 190, 108536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108536.
HAZELL, P.J, G.J. APPLEBY-THOMAS, K. HERLAAR, and J. PAINTER. Inelastic Deformation and Failure of Tungsten Carbide Under Ballistic-Loading Conditions. Materials Science and Engineering, 2010, 527(29-30), pp. 7638-7645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.024.
HOLMQUIST, T.J., G.R. JOHNSON and W.A. GOOCH. Modeling the 14.5 mm BS41 Projectile for Ballistic Impact Computations. WIT Transactions on Modelling and Simulation, 2005, 40. ISSN 1743-355X.
NILSSON M. Constitutive Model for Armox 500T and Armox 600T at Low and Medium Strain Rates [online]. 2003 [viewed 2023-12-21]. Available from: https://www.foi.se/rest-api/report/FOI-R-1068-SE
SENTHIL, K., M.A. IQBAL and S. RUPALI. Influence of Impactor Nature, Mass, Size and Shape on Ballistic Resistance of Mild Steel and Armox 500T Steel. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2018, 10(2), pp. 174-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419618807493.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Advances in Military Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal for any purpose, even commercially.
