Rating of the mobility of Military Logistic Vehicles Used in the Polish Armed Forces

Authors

  • Grzegorz Wiejak Military University of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-0306
  • M. Grzelak Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
  • R. Mroczek Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01788

Keywords:

analytic hierarchy process, military logistics, military vehicles, multicriteria decision making

Abstract

Mobility of military vehicles is a key element of military transport and it guarantees safety of the logistic system of the Armed Forces. The aim of this article is to compare medium-load and high-mobility means of transport belonging to the Polish Armed Forces and to identify the vehicle with the best parameters. The Analytic Hierarchy Process method was used for this, and this paper approximates its assumptions and process. Seven vehicles currently in use by the Polish Armed Forces were compared. As a result of the analysis, a hierarchy of the studied vehicles was established, ranking them from the highest to the lowest rated. The paper allows to assess whether the currently purchased Jelcz 442.32 is a good choice in the procuring policy of the Polish army.

References

BORUCKA, A. Assessment of the Influence of Selected Factors on the Wear of Braking System Components as an Element of Reliability of Means of Transport. In: 4th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE). Singapore: IEEE, 2019, pp. 207-211. DOI 10.1109/ICITE.2019.8880164.

BORUCKA, A. Three-State Markov Model of Using Transport Means. In: 18th International Scientific Conference on Business Logistics in Modern Manage-ment. Osijek: Faculty of Economics in Osijek, 2018, pp. 3-19.

Material Security of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland. Principles of operation (in Polish). Bydgoszcz: MON, 2012.

CHAN, H.K., X. SUN and S.H. CHUNG. When Should Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Be Used Instead of Analytic Hierarchy Process? Decision Support Systems, 2019, 125, 113114. DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113114.

ISHIZAKA, A. and A. LABIB. Review of the Main Developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(11), pp. 14336-14345. DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143.

DUDEK, M., K SOLECKA and M RICHTER. A Multi-Criteria Appraisal of the Selection of Means of Urban Passenger Transport Using the Electre and AHP Methods. Technical Transactions, 2020, 115(6), pp. 79-93. DOI 10.4467/2353737XCT.18.088.8693.

RYCZYŃSKI, J. and P. KRAWCZYSZYN. The Use of AHP Method to Select Optimum Means of Transport for Strategic Goods. In: 13th International Confer-ence on Industrial Logistics. Zakopane: ICIL, 2016, pp. 216-220. ISBN 978-83-62079-06-3.

SONAR, H.C. and S.D. KULKARNI. An Integrated AHP-MABAC Approach for Electric Vehicle Selection. Research in Transportation Business and Manage-ment, 2021, 41, 100665. DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100665.

BOUJELBENE, Y. and A. DERBEL. The Performance Analysis of Public Transport Operators in Tunisia Using AHP Method. Procedia Computer Science. 2015, 73, pp. 498-508. DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.039.

SAATY, T.L. Decision Making – the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2004, 13, pp. 1-35. DOI 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5.

AWASTHI, A., D. BREUIL, S.S. CHAUHAN, M. PARENT and T. REVEILLERE. A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach for Carsharing Stations Selection. Journal of Decision Systems, 2007, 16(1), pp. 57-78. DOI 10.3166/jds.16.57-78.

BORUCKA, A. Logistic Regression in Modeling and Assessment of Transport Services. Open Engineering, 2020, 10(1), pp. 26-34. DOI 10.1515/eng-2020-0029.

KURASIŃSKI, Z. Military Logistics Compendium (in Polish). Warsaw: Military University of Technology, 2014. ISBN 83-7938-025-8.

RAWSKI, A.Z. Modern Technology of the Polish Armed Forces (in Polish). Warsaw: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej, 2011. ISBN 83-62345-65-9.

Consumption Standards for Propellants and Lubricants – Ground Equipment: DU-4.21.3.04 (Normy Zużycia Materiałów Pędnych I Smarów-Sprzęt Naziemny, in Polish), Warsaw: MON. DGRSZ, 2017.

BRACH, J. Star 1466 (in Polish). Nowa Technika Wojskowa, 1999, 1999(12), pp. 20-21.

BRACH, J. Star 266 – Modernization Projects. Part II (in Polish). Nowa Technika Wojskowa, 2018, 2018(5), pp. 50-59.

Consumption Standards for Propellants and Lubricants – Ground Equipment (Normy Zużycia Materiałów Pędnych i Smarów. Sprzęt Naziemny, in Polish), Bydgoszcz: MON IWSZ, 2009.

BRACH, J. New Military STARS (in Polish). Nowa Technika Wojskowa, 1999, 1999(7), pp. 24.

SIMIŃSKI, P. Military Wheeled Vehicles (Wojskowe Pojazdy Kołowe, in Polish). Warsaw: Bel Studio, 2015. ISBN 83-7798-171-8.

KALKA, D. Jelcz Type Truck Type 442.32 (in Polish) [online], 2021 [viewed: 2022-10-28]. Available from: http://opisybroni.pl/jelcz-typ-442-32/

Manual Instruction (MI) for Jelcz 442.32 Box Truck (in Polish). Jelcz-Laskowice: Jelcz, 2016.

BRACH, J. Purchase of Medium and Heavy Utility Vehicles by the Polish Armed Forces in 2005 (in Polish). Nowa Technika Wojskowa, 2006, 2006(5), pp. 30-34.

BRACH, J. Bundeswehr Trucks for the Armed Forces of Poland (in Polish). Nowa Technika Wojskowa, 2004, 2004(4), pp. 18-21.

WILK, R. 888 Jelczy 442.32 dla WP (in Polish) [online], 2018 [viewed: 2022-10-28]. Available from: https://milmag.pl/888-jelczy-442-32-dla-wp/

Downloads

Published

28-03-2023

Issue

Section

Technical Information

Categories

How to Cite

Wiejak, G., Grzelak, M., & Mroczek, R. (2023). Rating of the mobility of Military Logistic Vehicles Used in the Polish Armed Forces . Advances in Military Technology, 18(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01788

Similar Articles

41-50 of 203

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.