Comparative Analysis of Standardized NATO Requirements for Laboratory Identification of Chemical Agents and Military Technical Means for Its Implementation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01455

Abstract

Deployable chemical laboratories are considered a highly specific part of the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic, intended for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defence in operations. Their professional activity is determined by a number of scientific and technical requirements, which are formulated by standards for sample identification. To achieve the required degree of credibility, it is particularly important to have specific technical capacities. This instrumentation is crucial for the implementation of laboratory analyzes. The article describes the state of chemical laboratories of the Chemical Corps in the context of standardized requirements and discusses some points of selected Alliance agreements which the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic have signed.

Author Biographies

  • Tomas Rozsypal, University of Defence
    NBC Defence Institute
  • Radim Zahradnicek, University of Defence
    NBC Defence Institute

References

Vševojsk-2-14. Combat Use of Chemical Troops (in Czech). Prague: Ministry of Defence, 2012.

Bi-SC Capability Codes and Capability Statements [online], 2016. [viewed 2020-09-09]. Available from: https://fr.scribd.com/document/382349178/Capability-Codes-and-Capability-Statements-2016-Bi-sc-Nu0083

NATO-STANAG 4632. Deployable NBC Analytical Laboratory. Brussels: NATO Standardization Agency, 2005.

AEP-66, Edition A. NATO Handbook for Sampling and Identification of Biologi-cal, Chemical and Radiological Agents (SIBCRA). Brussels: NATO Standardiza-tion Office, 2015.

ATP-3.8.1 Volume III. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defence Standards for Education, Training and Evaluation. Brussels: NATO Standardiza-tion Agency, 2011.

VANNINEN, P. Recommended Operating Procedures for Analysis in the Verifica-tion of Chemical Disarmament. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2017. ISBN 978-951-51-3916-0.

HAAS, R. Determination of Chemical Warfare Agents: Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Chlorovinylarsines (Lewisite) and their Metabolites by Derivatization with Thiols. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1998, 5(1), pp. 2-3. DOI 10.1007/BF02986365.

TERZIC, O., H. GREGG and P. de VOOGT. Identification of Chemicals Relevant to the Chemical Weapons Convention Using the Novel Sample-Preparation Meth-ods and Strategies of the Mobile Laboratory of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2015, 65, pp. 151-166. DOI 10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.012.

Preparation of Methodological Procedures and Standard Procedures for Work in Laboratory AL-3 “AL-3MET” (in Czech). Brno: Military Research Institute, 2020.

BOTHE, M. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction [online]. Ge-neva: Audiovisual Library of International Law, 1992. [viewed 2020-10-01]. Available from: https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/cpdpsucw/cpdpsucw.html

VORCE, S.P., J.H. SKLEROV and K.S. KALASINSKY. Assessment of the Ion-Trap Mass Spectrometer for Routine Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Drugs of Abuse Extracted from Urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2000, 24(7), pp. 595-601. DOI 10.1093/jat/24.7.595.

ETTRE, L.S. Nomenclature for Chromatography (IUPAC Recommendations 1993). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2009, 65(4), pp. 819-872. DOI 10.1351/pac199365040819.

Downloads

Published

24-02-2021

Issue

Section

Technical Information

Categories

How to Cite

Rozsypal, T., & Zahradnicek, R. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Standardized NATO Requirements for Laboratory Identification of Chemical Agents and Military Technical Means for Its Implementation. Advances in Military Technology, 16(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01455