Current Capabilities of Modal Analysis of Aircraft Propeller in ANSYS Mechanical Environment

Authors

  • Richard Vysoký TechSoft Engineering Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01160

Keywords:

aircraft propeller, ANSYS, CMS, cyclic symmetry, dynamics, FEM, modal analysis

Abstract

The article deals with the modal analysis of a small aircraft propeller. In here are discussed the possible three cases of the Finite Element Method (FEM) simulation, in the environment of ANSYS Mechanical software. Successively each of them is described by the theoretical and application parts. Further on, there are explained the important results from the modal analysis, i.e., the calculated natural frequencies, mode shapes, participation factors and effective masses. The following three cases of the FEM simulation were used: the classic approach, the cyclic symmetry modelling and the Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) method. At the end the calculated frequencies of the all three cases are compared.

References

HUJEČEK, Z. Study Modulus No.17 – Aircraft Propellers (in Czech). Brno: CERM, 2004. 96 p.

Anon. Training manual – Dynamics – Release 8.1. Canonsburg: SAS IP, 2004. 150 p.

VYSOKÝ, R. A Contribution to the Coupled Oscillation of a Small Turboprop Engine (in Czech) [PhD Thesis]. Brno: University of Defence, 2015. 104 p.

ANSYS Mechanical APDL Technology Demonstration Guide. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2013. 654 p.

Anon. ANSYS v7.1 Modal Cyclic Symmetry: Answers to Common Questions. Middlebury: CAE Associates, 2003. 73 p.

Anon. Cyclic Symmetry Analysis. ANSYS 2002 Conference, C. A. Evolution, Mechanics and Simulation Support Development Group, 2003. 26 p.

HEMEZ, F.M. Roy Craig, Engineering Educator and Pioneer Contributor to Component Mode Synthesis. In IMAC Conference, 2003. 12 p.

Anon. Analysis of Large Assemblies Using Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) Technique in ANSYS Workbench and MAPDL – Ask the Experts. Webinar. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2011.

ANSYS Mechanical APDL Advanced Analysis Guide. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2013. 414 p.

IMAOKA, S. Component Mode Synthesis in ANSYS Workbench Simulation. ANSYS Advantage, 2007, Vol. I, No. 3, p. 26-27.

JAMES, S. Coupled Rotor-Housing Dynamics Using Component Mode Synthesis. Canonsburg: ANSYS Corporation, 2011. 20 p.

RATH, R. Analysis of Large Assemblies Using Superelements in ANSYS Workbench. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2013. [cited 2013-09-11]. Available from: .

RIXEN, D. Dynamic Substructuring Concepts – Tutorial. Delft: University of Technology, 2010. 59 p.

THIEFFRY, P. Reduction Techniques, Part 2: Substructuring – Applicability and Examples. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2012. 22 p.

ZUO, Y. and WANG, J. A Component Mode Synthesis Method for 3-D Finite Element Models of Aero-Engines. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, Vol. 12, No. 29, p. 5157-5166.

Downloads

Published

18-09-2017

Issue

Section

Research Paper

Categories

How to Cite

Vysoký, R. (2017). Current Capabilities of Modal Analysis of Aircraft Propeller in ANSYS Mechanical Environment. Advances in Military Technology, 12(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01160

Similar Articles

81-90 of 147

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.